| Author |
Message |
|
Dr Zoidberg
|
Post subject: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt  Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:06 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:04 am
Posts: 409
Location: Oxford, UK
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
joeycusack
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 10:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 am
Posts: 56
Location: UK
|
|
What a shame - I was looking forward to this. No idea what they will do now.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WinkyP4P
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:03 am |
|
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 10:35 am
Posts: 1251
Location: n00 y0rk
|
|
What's funny, is I heard Peterson was the one who wanted random testing.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Metherlance
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:40 am |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 1039
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
|
WinkyP4P wrote: What's funny, is I heard Peterson was the one who wanted random testing. Ask for drug testing - fail drug test - hold on to title longer. T'is genius. _________________ My Protein UK Use referral MP96363 for 5% off.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Brooklyn_teacher
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 8:27 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:36 pm
Posts: 6913
|
|
I'm not that surprised actually. He looked gigantic at the weight v Khan.
_________________
I look in your eyes and c fear! Ill take your sole and give it the devil
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Brazen
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 1:15 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 941
|
|
Given the liberal nature of US drug testing, I wouldn't be surprised if the fight goes ahead.
_________________
"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth." -- Tyson.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
vicenteumanzor
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:56 pm
Posts: 1436
|
|
Its officially off.
_________________
Chente~Chente
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeycusack
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:17 am |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 am
Posts: 56
Location: UK
|
http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/79 ... ne-pelletsAccording to this, Peterson had been taking the testosterone pellets since before the first fight in December! This is just bad, bad, bad. The fight is off. I wonder if the result of the first fight will be changed in any way.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Brazen
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 941
|
Khan's reaction with ES. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiLsFol4 ... ture=share- Peterson should be banned. Permanently. - New fight, June 30th. - Jones Jr. 'Khan's the only fighter who could trouble Mayweather'. Interesting. Peterson's no different, potentially worse, than Margarito. His (alleged) cheating puts a new spin on the Khan bout. Both in terms of Khan's excellent performance and the controversy surrounding the scoring and result. With this, and the freak show, Boxing's some kind of soap-opera at the moment.
_________________
"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth." -- Tyson.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeycusack
|
Post subject: Re: Khan V Peterson 2 in doubt Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 4:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:07 am
Posts: 56
Location: UK
|
|
I agree Brazen. Imagine if he had done some serious damage to Khan? That whole first fight seems odd on so many levels now. This could have been a really good few weeks for boxing with the Cotto/Mayweather fight, Khan/Peterson and Pacman/Bradley, but all of this leaves a bad taste.
Khan's speed could trouble PBF, but Khan seems too open for a class operator like Mayweather.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
